Indonesia Open Access LIS Journal index
ANALYSIS OF ONLINE ACCESSIBILITY OF PUBLIC ACCESS CATALOGUE ON SLIMS AND INLISLITE APPLICATIONS BASED ON WCAG 2.0
Edulib : journal of library and information science
View Archive Info| Field | Value | |
| Title |
ANALYSIS OF ONLINE ACCESSIBILITY OF PUBLIC ACCESS CATALOGUE ON SLIMS AND INLISLITE APPLICATIONS BASED ON WCAG 2.0
ANALYSIS OF ONLINE ACCESSIBILITY OF PUBLIC ACCESS CATALOGUE ON SLIMS AND INLISLITE APPLICATIONS BASED ON WCAG 2.0 |
|
| Creator |
Cahyono, M. Annas Dwi
Inawati, Inawati |
|
| Subject |
Accessibility; OPAC; Website
Accessibility; OPAC; Website |
|
| Description |
This study aims to determine the level of OPAC accessibility in SLiMS and INLISLite applications. Four main guidelines on website accessibility will be analyzed: perceivable, operable, adaptable, and robust. The four guidelines are based on the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG). This study uses a quantitative approach with descriptive methods and data analysis techniques using manual checks based on the WCAG-EM guidelines, which focus on two levels, namely A and AA. The results of the study based on four indicators are (1) perceivable on SLiMS and INLISLite experiencing problems in providing alternative text, (2) operable on SLiMS and INLISLite found problems in the focus element, (3) understandable on SLiMS and INLISLite fail to meet the criteria for providing language, and (4) robust, both applications have succeeded in utilizing HTML syntax according to the provisions. Thus, from the four indicators, the SLiMS and INLISLite applications still need to meet several criteria at level A, namely the criteria for using language, using color, and providing alternative text on non-text elements. Meanwhile, at level AA, there is a failure in the focus element.
This study aims to determine the accessibility level of OPAC in the SLiMS and INLISLite applications. Four main guidelines on aspects of website accessibility will be analyzed: perceivable, operable, adaptable, and robust. The four guidelines are based on the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG). This study uses a quantitative approach with descriptive methods and data analysis techniques using manual checks based on the WCAG-EM guidelines focusing on two levels, A and AA. The results of the research based on four indicators are (1) perceivable in SLiMS and INLISLite experiencing problems in providing alternative texts, (2) operable in SLiMS and INLISLite found problems with focus elements, (3) understandable in SLiMS and INLISLite failing to meet the criteria for providing language, and (4) robust, both applications have succeeded in utilizing HTML syntax according to the provisions. So, of the four indicators, the SLiMS and INLISLite applications still need to meet several criteria at level A, namely the criteria for using language, using colour, and providing alternative text on non-text elements. Meanwhile, at the AA level, there is a failure in the focus element. |
|
| Publisher |
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
|
|
| Contributor |
—
— |
|
| Date |
2022-11-25
|
|
| Type |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — |
|
| Format |
application/pdf
|
|
| Identifier |
https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/edulib/article/view/51377
10.17509/edulib.v12i2.51377 |
|
| Source |
Edulib; Vol 12, No 2 (2022); 161-177
2528-2182 2089-6549 10.17509/edulib.v12i2 |
|
| Language |
eng
|
|
| Relation |
https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/edulib/article/view/51377/pdf
10.17509/edulib.v12i2.51377.g22790 |
|
| Rights |
Copyright (c) 2022 Edulib
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
|